Prediction of Nathan Healey vs Richard Bloomfield Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Healey vs R. Bloomfield

Nathan Healey

AUS

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

159

Best Rank

176

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$111.2K

Career Money

$59.8K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Richard Bloomfield

GBR

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

159

Best Rank

176

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$111.2K

Career Money

$59.8K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Healey 0 - 1 Bloomfield

They have played 3 sets in total, with Nathan Healey winning 1 and Richard Bloomfield winning 2. The last match between Richard Bloomfield and Nathan Healey was at the Singha Tennis Classic - Tarzana, 19-07-2005, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Richard Bloomfield getting the victory 4-6 6-1 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Healey	0
Bloomfield	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Singha Tennis Classic - Tarzana(07-19-05)

Stats

Richard Bloomfield

Nathan Healey

N. Healey vs R. Bloomfield H2H Profile

N. Healey	Stats	R. Bloomfield
$111,195	Career Prize Money	$59,790
52.89% (183-163)	Career Total W/L	57.70% (352-258)
0	Hard	1
3	Titles	11
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Healey vs R. Bloomfield Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nathan Healey has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Richard Bloomfield has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nathan Healey, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Richard Bloomfield has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nathan Healey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Richard Bloomfield has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nathan Healey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Richard Bloomfield winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nathan Healey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 36/22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 22/28). Richard Bloomfield has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 173/101), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 42/48).
Player level: In the last year, Nathan Healey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Richard Bloomfield has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nathan Healey winning 0 times and Richard Bloomfield being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nathan Healey winning 1 and Richard Bloomfield winning 2.
The last match between Nathan Healey and Richard Bloomfield was at the Singha Tennis Classic - Tarzana, 19-07-2005, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Richard Bloomfield getting the victory 4-6 6-1 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nathan Healey has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Richard Bloomfield has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nathan Healey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Richard Bloomfield has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nathan Healey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Richard Bloomfield has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nathan Healey vs Richard Bloomfield Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Healey vs R. Bloomfield H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Healey	Stats	R. Bloomfield
0	H2H Matches Won	1
1	Sets Won	2
12	Games Won	17
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	100% (1/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Healey Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Usa F12 - 08-06-2009
R1 Lester CookL. Cook	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Yuba City Challenger - 01-06-2009
Q1 Tim SmyczekT. Smyczek	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Ford Tennis Championships - Louisville - 27-10-2008
Q2 Ryan SweetingR. Sweeting	L	6-3 7-6(1)	Stats
Q1 Shane CollinsS. Collins	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
The Mercedes Benz of Calabasas - Calabasas - 13-10-2008
Q1 Amir WeintraubA. Weintraub	W	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

R. Bloomfield Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - London - 29-06-2015
Q1 Farrukh DustovF. Dustov	L	4-6 6-2 6-1	Stats
Great Britain F6 - 24-02-2014
Q2 Joshua ParisJ. Paris	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q3 Adam Thornton-BrownA. Thornton-Brown	L	6-3 ret.	Stats
Great Britain F5 - 17-02-2014
Q3 Clay CrawfordC. Crawford	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Q2 Sizya Ernest KivandaS. Ernest	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Healey vs R. Bloomfield Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Healey	Stats	R. Bloomfield
52.89% (183/163)	YTD Win/Loss	57.70% (352/258)
53.31% (435/381)	Sets Win/Loss	56.52% (793/610)
51.67% (4091/3827)	Games Win/Loss	52.55% (7229/6527)
53.99% (115/98)	Hard Win/Loss	53.29% (81/71)
44.00% (22/28)	Clay Win/Loss	52.17% (12/11)
40.00% (10/15)	Indoor Hard W/L	62.90% (217/128)
62.07% (36/22)	Grass Win/Loss	46.67% (42/48)
0.05	Aces Per Game	0.08
208	Aces Total	520
0.05	Double Faults Per Game	0.03
196	Total Double Faults	229
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
493.14	Average Opponent Rank	507.67
58% (1370/2374)	1st Serve %	60% (2718/4518)
72% (988/1370)	1st Serve Win %	74% (2020/2718)
48% (479/996)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (918/1800)
34% (70/204)	Break Points Won % (Total)	36% (96/269)
35% (804/2296)	Return Points Win %	32% (1394/4345)
50.00% (11/11)	Slam W/L	22.22% (4/14)
25.00% (1/3)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
44.78% (30/37)	Main Tour W/L	46.51% (20/23)
52.04% (102/94)	Challenger W/L	49.78% (112/113)
69.64% (39/17)	Futures W/L	66.67% (216/108)
54% (176/327)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (345/589)
27% (3/11)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	25% (2/8)
44% (63/143)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (141/275)
44% (51/117)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (98/190)
82% (192/157)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (353/301)
18% (192/35)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (353/52)
16% (154/25)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (255/50)